Founding pilots are now open

ASC 740 REVIEW WORKSPACE

Find the exception.
Follow the evidence.

Provision Review helps tax teams examine an already-prepared provision package, connect each finding to its source support, and preserve the accountant's decision—without posting to source systems.

One historical period · Private workspace · Accountant-controlled

Illustrative finding · Synthetic data

Provision-to-GL
Review

EXCEPTION 04

Final provision tax expense does not equal the mapped GL balance.

Provision$18.42M
General ledger$18.10M
Variance$320K
Exact supportTax provision · Summary!H42
Coordinate linked
Accept findingRequest evidenceEscalate
One finding. Two source coordinates. The reviewer decides.
Trace the review
01Read-only by design
02Source-linked evidence
03Accountant retains authority
04Private workspace

A provision package is not one workbook.

It is a chain of calculations, ledgers, supporting files, disclosures, and reviewer judgments. Provision Review is designed to make that chain visible.

A CONTROLLED REVIEW, IN MOTION

Follow one finding from signal to decision.

Select each stage to see how Provision Review maintains the thread between a reported exception, its exact support, and the reviewer's judgment.

Illustrative reviewProvision-to-GL
Historical period · Synthetic
Exception 04Mapped balances do not agree.Review
Provision$18.42MSummary!H42
General ledger$18.10MAccount 7210
Variance$320KRequires review
01

The workspace surfaces the difference. It does not infer that either source is correct.

EVIDENCE IN CONTEXT

Move from finding to exact support without losing the thread.

Each review item keeps the reported amount, supporting coordinate, period, and reviewer action together. Missing evidence remains visible rather than being silently inferred.

Review principleEvidence informs the reviewer. It does not make the conclusion.
Finding 04Exact support
Synthetic
SourceCoordinateAmountStatus
WPTax provisionSummary!H42$18.42MLinked
GLGeneral ledgerAccount 7210$18.10MLinked
BRApproved bridgeNot provided—Missing
Recommended next actionConfirm whether the $320K true-up was posted, or provide the approved bridge.

PRODUCT PROOF

Inspect the record—not a promise.

This public proof room uses one synthetic exception to show what the review workspace exposes: the finding, its exact evidence, and the control record.

Synthetic dataNo client uploadNo source writes
Review finding1Provision-to-GL
Linked coordinates2Workbook + ledger
Missing support1Approved bridge
Source writes0Read-only boundary
Final authorityHumanNamed accountant
Illustrative review packetPR-SYN-004
Public demonstration only.
No customer information is shown.
Evidence-linked review artifactFinding record
Synthetic
Exception 04

Final provision tax expense does not equal the mapped GL balance.

Review
Prepared provision$18.42MTax provision · Summary!H42
Mapped ledger$18.10MGeneral ledger · Account 7210
Difference$320KNot concluded
Why this was flagged

The two frozen source amounts differ. The record does not infer whether a posting is missing or the workbook is stale.

01
Practitioner-informed

Shaped through accountant interviews and guided practitioner testing.

02
Inspect before believing

Every displayed conclusion is separated from the evidence that supports it.

03
Narrow pilot boundary

One authorized historical period is evaluated before any broader commitment.

CONTROLLED BY DESIGN

Built above the systems you already use.

A narrow review boundary makes the product easier to evaluate and keeps professional authority exactly where it belongs.

01
No source-system writes

The workspace does not post entries or change the underlying package.

02
No unsupported inference

Missing or conflicting evidence remains visible to the reviewer.

03
No automated sign-off

The named accountant retains conclusions, escalation, and approval.

04
No system replacement

Review the package produced by your existing provision and workpaper process.

EVIDENCE BEFORE PROMISES

Credibility should be inspectable too.

Provision Review is early. The honest signal is a practitioner-reviewed workflow, explicit controls, and a public record of what has—and has not—been validated.

Formative validation complete

CURRENT PRACTITIONER SIGNAL

Controlled workflow reviewed by a practicing accountant.

The accountant completed the historical review flow and reported strong satisfaction with the application's accuracy and operation. This is qualitative pilot feedback, not an assurance report or general performance benchmark.

1Practitioner workflow
1Historical period path
0Source-system writes
HumanFinal authority
Public validation ledgerRelease posture
Current
01Practitioner workflowCompleted
02Evidence-link reviewObserved
03Enterprise-scale benchmarkNot yet
04SOC 2 / ISO certificationNot claimed

Claims stay narrow until additional evidence exists.

No customer logos, invented testimonials, or certification badges are used.

Open the trust & privacy record

WHAT THE REVIEW LEAVES BEHIND

A usable review record—not another opaque score.

01

Findings register

Prioritized exceptions, warnings, owners, status, and reviewer disposition.

Review queue
02

Evidence index

Exact workbook coordinates, ledger accounts, source files, and missing support.

Source lineage
03

Review record

Accountant actions, notes, escalation context, and preserved decision history.

Human authority
04

Results presentation

A guided walkthrough of observed findings, unresolved evidence, and next actions.

Pilot closeout
Scope note

Outputs support the named accountant's review. They do not replace the provision package, provide tax advice, or constitute sign-off.

Review the founding pilot

FOUNDING FIRM PILOT

Turn one historical period into an evidence-linked review.

Complete a two-minute fit check. The website prepares a structured email on your device; it does not receive a provision package or store your answers.

01Contact
02Pilot fit
03Review
Step 1 of 3

Who should we speak with?

Only the contact details needed to respond to this inquiry.

Device-local inquiry. This public form does not upload files, create an account, or store the information entered.

STRAIGHT ANSWERS

Know the boundary before the first conversation.

01What should be submitted through this website?

Only business contact information and a high-level pilot objective. Do not enter client names, tax amounts, workpaper details, credentials, or upload a provision package.

02What makes a package ready for the founding pilot?

A completed, authorized historical ASC 740 period with the provision package and its supporting files available for a controlled review. Readiness is confirmed before accepting payment.

03Does Provision Review change an ERP, ledger, or workbook?

No. The founding pilot operates within a read-only review boundary and does not post entries or alter source materials.

04Who makes the accounting conclusion?

The named accountant. Provision Review organizes findings and evidence; it does not provide tax advice, issue an assurance opinion, or automate sign-off.

05How does the $1,500 founding price work?

The proposed structure is $750 to begin after scope and readiness are confirmed, followed by $750 after the results presentation. Final terms are documented before work begins.

06What happens after the request?

You receive a response to confirm fit, authorized participants, confidentiality expectations, package readiness, and the controlled pilot boundary before any client data is requested.